<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Being Church: Missionally Shaped</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Shout-Out: Brittany McComb by timiekley</title>
		<link>http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/2008/05/03/shout-out-brittany-mccomb/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>timiekley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 05:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/?p=254#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>Hey Brit - My name is Tim... Not Scot...  Thanks though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brit - My name is Tim&#8230; Not Scot&#8230;  Thanks though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shout-Out: Brittany McComb by Brit</title>
		<link>http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/2008/05/03/shout-out-brittany-mccomb/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>Brit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 22:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/?p=254#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>Thanks Scot! I wasn't even aware that many people have watched the youtube video. God bless you as you continue to seek after him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Scot! I wasn&#8217;t even aware that many people have watched the youtube video. God bless you as you continue to seek after him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Authorship Question: Scot McKnight&#8217;s Site by Facebook &#187; Authorship Question: Scot McKnight&#8217;s Site</title>
		<link>http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/authorship-question-scot-mcknights-site/#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook &#187; Authorship Question: Scot McKnight&#8217;s Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/?p=253#comment-1378</guid>
		<description>[...] Being Church: Missionally Shaped wrote an interesting post today on Authorship Question: Scot McKnight&#8217;s SiteHere&#8217;s a quick excerptI think I am going to start a group on facebook or something called, “B. A. ” or “Blogs Anonymous&#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Being Church: Missionally Shaped wrote an interesting post today on Authorship Question: Scot McKnight&#8217;s SiteHere&#8217;s a quick excerptI think I am going to start a group on facebook or something called, “B. A. ” or “Blogs Anonymous&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Me by hunter</title>
		<link>http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/about-me/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/?page_id=200#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>you should check out these blogs.  The church beyond sunday has been experiencing what it is that you long to see, but are wondering if it can be done.

http://beyondsunday.blogspot.com/

also check out http://thechurchofgodhasnofuture.blogspot.com/  for an ongoing conversation about the questions you ask.

Fellow laborers!

hunter (http://www.blogger.com/profile/11626182011687684121)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you should check out these blogs.  The church beyond sunday has been experiencing what it is that you long to see, but are wondering if it can be done.</p>
<p><a href="http://beyondsunday.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://beyondsunday.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>also check out <a href="http://thechurchofgodhasnofuture.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thechurchofgodhasnofuture.blogspot.com/</a>  for an ongoing conversation about the questions you ask.</p>
<p>Fellow laborers!</p>
<p>hunter (http://www.blogger.com/profile/11626182011687684121)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Missional Church: Book Review by Ethan Cooke</title>
		<link>http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/missional-church-book-review/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Cooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/missional-church-book-review/#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>eugene westering intergradation buzzgloak abrasax grobianism fibromyoma remembrancership
&lt;a href="http://www.patspainting.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Pat's Painting&lt;/a&gt;
 http://www.worldserviceworld.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eugene westering intergradation buzzgloak abrasax grobianism fibromyoma remembrancership<br />
<a href="http://www.patspainting.com/" rel="nofollow">Pat&#8217;s Painting</a><br />
 <a href="http://www.worldserviceworld.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldserviceworld.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John 14:6 - A unique conversation by Steve</title>
		<link>http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/john-146-a-unique-conversation/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 07:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/?p=248#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim - Good post. Sometimes we make "Jesus is the Way" a very "easy" statement; this is a good reflection on how challenging it really is. I think the words from this passage that may be at times divisive (and that perhaps we use wrongly with others) are the next ones - "no man comes to the Father except through me." So easy to use that verse in a simplistic, conversation-ending kind of way: "we're right, you are wrong" - yet it is a pretty exclusive statement. The inclusiveness vs exclusiveness of Jesus (the way, the truth and the life) has been perhaps the biggest tension in my faith, and the way this verse is typically thrown around in the church hasn't helped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim - Good post. Sometimes we make &#8220;Jesus is the Way&#8221; a very &#8220;easy&#8221; statement; this is a good reflection on how challenging it really is. I think the words from this passage that may be at times divisive (and that perhaps we use wrongly with others) are the next ones - &#8220;no man comes to the Father except through me.&#8221; So easy to use that verse in a simplistic, conversation-ending kind of way: &#8220;we&#8217;re right, you are wrong&#8221; - yet it is a pretty exclusive statement. The inclusiveness vs exclusiveness of Jesus (the way, the truth and the life) has been perhaps the biggest tension in my faith, and the way this verse is typically thrown around in the church hasn&#8217;t helped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I have to think already? by timiekley</title>
		<link>http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/i-have-to-think-already/#comment-1358</link>
		<dc:creator>timiekley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/?p=246#comment-1358</guid>
		<description>Jathan, I think you are right - about God's purpose and plan - being to love.  Even in that though, I struggle to think that God's sole purpose can be confined into a short statement or pithy saying.  I totally believe God is love but He is so much more than that.  I think we try to compact God into something we can grasp - and i don't think we can.  His purpose is so much greater and extensive than my purpose is ( even in respects to love.  How do we encompass a God that cannot be encompassed? How do we understand a God who has told us He can not be understood?  That is what I worry about the most.  Maybe not worry, but I wonder a lot about that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jathan, I think you are right - about God&#8217;s purpose and plan - being to love.  Even in that though, I struggle to think that God&#8217;s sole purpose can be confined into a short statement or pithy saying.  I totally believe God is love but He is so much more than that.  I think we try to compact God into something we can grasp - and i don&#8217;t think we can.  His purpose is so much greater and extensive than my purpose is ( even in respects to love.  How do we encompass a God that cannot be encompassed? How do we understand a God who has told us He can not be understood?  That is what I worry about the most.  Maybe not worry, but I wonder a lot about that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I have to think already? by wisconsinway</title>
		<link>http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/i-have-to-think-already/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>wisconsinway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/?p=246#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>Sounds like you have been thinking deeply again Tim.
Sounds about right!  I know it is very important for us to try and fathom God's Ways, but we will never totally grasp all of what God's desire for coming to earth was.  So, I really like what you said about not knowing God's Ways, and to start running alongside of God in order to find that out more!  It is very important!  I will have to think more on these questions and see what kind of conclusion I come to.
hmmmmm....
Well, since I just got engaged I might be a little partial, but....actually for me, I think Jesus' purpose was actually very simple...to Love!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like you have been thinking deeply again Tim.<br />
Sounds about right!  I know it is very important for us to try and fathom God&#8217;s Ways, but we will never totally grasp all of what God&#8217;s desire for coming to earth was.  So, I really like what you said about not knowing God&#8217;s Ways, and to start running alongside of God in order to find that out more!  It is very important!  I will have to think more on these questions and see what kind of conclusion I come to.<br />
hmmmmm&#8230;.<br />
Well, since I just got engaged I might be a little partial, but&#8230;.actually for me, I think Jesus&#8217; purpose was actually very simple&#8230;to Love!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Small Gospel? by Todd Hiestand &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday Links - 3/29/08 - A pastor and web designer living missionally in suburbia</title>
		<link>http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/a-small-gospel/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Hiestand &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday Links - 3/29/08 - A pastor and web designer living missionally in suburbia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 06:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/a-small-gospel/#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>[...] Tim Keel of Jacob&#8217;s Well Church, writes a great article on &#8220;The Gospel Question&#8221; for the Christian Vision Project. Read it here. Tim Miekley told me about the article and he blogged about it on his blog here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tim Keel of Jacob&#8217;s Well Church, writes a great article on &#8220;The Gospel Question&#8221; for the Christian Vision Project. Read it here. Tim Miekley told me about the article and he blogged about it on his blog here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Three Month Study on Baptism by Jewelgh</title>
		<link>http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/my-three-month-study-on-baptism/#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator>Jewelgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beingekklesia.wordpress.com/?p=217#comment-1355</guid>
		<description>thats for sure, man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats for sure, man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
